Is your retirement fund
financing immigration enforcement?

Seven publicly traded companies hold active contracts with ICE for detention, surveillance, and deportation. Most investors hold at least one without knowing it. Enter any mutual fund or ETF ticker to find out.

The companies
Check your fund
▲ Top 10 most exposed

<verify>  ·  Tool designed by Jon Nealon  ·  V1.7

Holdings based on known index composition as of July 2026. GEO and CoreCivic index membership confirmed following the June 27, 2026 Russell US Indexes reconstitution. Palantir (PLTR) joined the S&P 500 on September 23, 2024 and the Nasdaq-100 on December 23, 2024. GEO and CoreCivic remain Russell 2000 / S&P 600 small-cap components. Thomson Reuters is Canadian-domiciled; RELX is UK-domiciled — both appear primarily in international and global funds. GlobalX (JET) trades on the NEO Exchange (Canada) and is not held in US index funds. Weight percentages are approximate and based on publicly available index data. Holdings change quarterly. For informational and journalistic purposes only — not investment advice.

How the rankings are calculated. Each fund in the database is assigned an exposure score based on which of the seven companies it holds and how dependent each company is on ICE revenue. The score for each holding is calculated by multiplying the company's approximate weight in the fund by a revenue-intensity factor: GEO Group and GlobalX score 5 (ICE contracts represent the majority of their business); CoreCivic scores 4 (~30% ICE revenue); Palantir scores 2 (ICE is a significant and fast-growing contract but a minority of total revenue); Thomson Reuters and RELX score 1 (ICE contracts are a small fraction of large, diversified businesses). A fund's total score is the sum of all its holding scores. This means a small-cap value fund holding GEO and CoreCivic at elevated index weights can rank above a total market fund holding all three US companies at lower weights — which is the correct editorial result: concentration in the most ICE-dependent businesses matters more than breadth. Funds scoring zero hold none of the seven companies; these are predominantly ESG-screened funds, bond funds, and funds tracking non-US markets.